Guns In Our Schools… Really?

Posted on: 3 Comments

If Corporations are People, How come they don’t feel shame?  If Corporations are People, where is their natural regret, guilt and remorse?  These are direct questions for the NRA and gun lobbyist’s proposing to have more guns in our schools.

Wow, you really have to be kidding!  More guns in our schools!  Fight violence with violence?  Really?!  Deal with gun massacres by increasing guns so they exist visually everywhere for our children to see and fantasize about.  It’s like saying that the adults and parents and teachers are so weak and ineffectual, unimaginative,  and powerless that even they will resort to guns as a  solution to the gun problem.  We “grown-ups” can’t come up with a better more involved solution for our children?  Wow, that really sucks.  And that is the message it will give.

Inside the classroom, the message to students will be:  we can’t handle you; we don’t trust you or ourselves to handle you; you are not entirely responsible for your own behavior so we have a policeman to do it.

For sure, having more guns in our schools benefits Gun lobbies and the NRA, and our Prison, Military Industrial Complex.  But, having more guns in our schools has nothing to do with educating children or assisting our deteriorating educational system.  Guns in our schools will actually do the opposite, creating an atmosphere of fear, distrust and prejudice.  It does not even come close to addressing the deeper problems, issues and hypocrisies that have led to school gun violence, i.e., what is going in inside our children’s minds?  Are they getting enough attention? nurturance, support, stimulation from learning?  Are they being abused or neglected?  Are we paying attention to the signs of a student needing attention?  if anything, we need more counselors, more trauma therapists’, more communication, more mentors, Big Brothers and Sisters’,  and more active involvement by parents as well as teachers.  We need more teachers!  Not policeman!

It is very worrisome but likely to assume that, due to the workload of our teachers, the discipline of our children will be put in the hands of untrained but armed policeman;  classrooms will be turned into military settings, in which learning and fear will become increasingly associated.

Putting guns and armed guards in our schools is a short-term reaction formation, as well as outright violent collusion with the collective wish already ingrained in our youth, ‘that guns will solve our problems’.  Not to mention that not all policeman are the same.

What if a student with ADHD decides to act out and “test” a police officer?  And, what if that police officer handles this by taking out his gun?  What message will that give to students’?  What if  a police officer is biased against certain children or racist and harasses children of color or girls more often than other children?  How do we explain that to our own children? We have no guarantee of the mental health or ethical character of our police officers’ as exemplified by so many profiling abuses and deaths across the Country.

This is not only a short-sighted and deeply flawed idea being proposed by those who have the most to gain, at the expense of the kinds of environments’ that encourage and nurture learning, but it is a crazy idea with very concerning consequences we haven’t even begun to think through.

I say a resounding, earth shattering “NO” to guns in our schools.

3 Responses

  1. Crystal Worl says:

    Hi Auntie,

    Great thoughts. It amazed me, when driving back to Santa Fe from Greenbay (2 weeks ago) we stopped in Kansas and went to eat at Taco Johns…yuck…anyways I was shocked to see a flyer that was a raffle for a high school baseball team fundraiser and they were raffling off a riffle gun! How aweful is that?

    Thanks again for sharing your much needed ideas! I couldnt agree more with you.

    Love you xoxoxo -Crystal

  2. Susie Richardson says:

    Totally insane!

  3. Bruce Kugler says:

    Wonderful thoughts about a real big problem, and appreciate the sensitivity and concern about the emotional and psych. aspects of the influence on some our our goofy thinking on the development of our kids.In other words, offering that that protection as well.
    (Carla you can reduce this if you want, got a bit carried away).
    It hard for particularly psychologically minded people to sometimes to assume that others can think in these ways about the social, political, interpersonal world, as they (we) do, but as my mentor said to me once, No, Bruce, most people don’t think about these things like you do. It’s not just that they have the views they do that drives me absolutely bat s—t crazy, when I listen to talk radio and hear how concrete folks sometimes think, due to their fears, that solidifies an already rigid mind, but that rigidity and fear doesn’t allow for an observing ego to even compare their ideas to others or to reflect and see how nutty their ideas are. But it’s wonderful you can, and have the values and sensitivities you do to express such important thoughts to us in non radio land. Like crystal said, raffling a gun ? They don’t see the collective, what is right to protect the common good, and “all” people, except from the threat to their own individual lives by the government, who I believe represents the unconscious parental imagos that did not protect these people from themselves and each other as kids. Many have been severely exploited, unprotected and abused as children by authoritarian parenting that leaves them feeling angry as hell, and protective of the same “forces” that hurt that them. Like people who believe G-d is non existent because that force allows for injustice, they displace their anger towards their sadistic parents onto the government (Dizzy, my cat just agreed with me).
    Bruce (the goose) Kugler

Leave a Reply

©2024 Carla Kleefeld PhD, LPCC